Join me in reforming divorce courts in Washington State:​

• Download 

• Enter your address and sign

• Mail to:

  • Initiative IL26-275​

  • 7001 Seaview Ave NW

  • Suite 160-836

  • Seattle, WA 98117

• Or scan and send to: 

 

 

This is the 1st of several initiatives that will attempt to force divorce courts in the State of Washington to start prioritizing children and force fairness in the divorce process.

​

Future initiatives

​

• Law to be updated to indicate that divorce settlements shall not be accepted when their are accusations of child abuse or domestic violence.

  • Currently the law states (RCW 25.09.016), "Mediation is generally inappropriate in cases involving domestic violence and child abuse”.  Family law courts are completely ignoring this law, it is apparently always appropriate.  By not reporting child abuse and signing a divorce settlement agreement without investigating Family Courts are allowing false allegations to be used as a device to manipulate the divorce process in order to get maximum financial benefit for the accuser.  The process is simple:

    • Accuse your husband of child abuse, lock him out of the house, restrict him from seeing the child.

    • Your accusation of child abuse will never be reported to Child Protective Services (CPS) for investigation and does not even need to be remotely believable, King County “Family” court will never consider a child abuse allegation as every being false. 

    • They will give you the benefit of doubt and everyone in the divorce process will consider the father as possibly being a child abuser, though they will make no attempt to investigate it.

    • They will restrict the father from seeing the child, give you control of the property, give you control of decisions about the child. 

    • You can even ask the court to make any visitation during the week with the child occur while the father works, that way if he doesn’t take time off work he loses the time; if he does take time off work and loses his job the court will still require him to pay support to you.

    • If the father loves the child, believes he is innocent and wishes to clear his reputation of being a possible child abuser, he will settle the divorce and give you a very favorable property settlement. You can even trade time with the child for money. 

    • If you settle, King County “Family” court will sign the settlement and never question your credibility, they will treat him like he might be a child abuser regardless of the fact that you never attempted to argue your claims in court.   ​

    • If he doesn't settle King Count "Family" court will restrict the father from the child based on the fact that he "might" be a child abuser.

• No judge shall accept a divorce settlement agreement that results in additional time with a child after money is exchanged.

  • Family law courts in the State of Washington are readily accepting ​divorce settlement agreements where it is clear money was exchanged for additional time with a child after the court restricted a co-parent from see a child during a temporary visitation schedule.  By conducting this act, family law courts are actively participating in the ransoming of child, a violation of state, federal and international law.  The initiative will be worded to make it clear that any judge accepting such an agreement will face felony charges and immediately be removed from the bench.​​

• No judge shall not refuse reasonable requests ​from either co-parent for medical or psychological treatment for a child.

  • Family law courts in the State of Washington are refusing to allow children to see medical professionals​ when it does not the interest or desires of the female.  

• An party locking another party out of the house without prior restraining order shall be considered domestic abuse and be held in contempt of court.

  • It is now standard procedure for women to lock men out of the house, with even attempting to get a restraining order which requires virtually no evidence and even the tiniest amount of effort.  They are doing this because they want control of the property, and the courts are accommodating them by ignoring the rights of men's access to the home.  Courts reward locking men out of the home by giving women control of the property in a temporary order.  Women are then dumping men's property outside which the courts are considering civil behavior.  This is little more than state sponsored theft of property